Personal tools
You are here: Home News CCC News Cyclist casualties in Camden 2009-10

Cyclist casualties in Camden 2009-10

TfL casualty studies for 2009-10 show a 40% increase in cyclist casualties in Camden. Camden Council has sent us an analysis of the locations of these casualties

TfL's report Casualties in Greater London during 2010 is at:

http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/Cycling/casualties-in-greater-london-2010.pdf 

Table 2 (for Greater London) for cyclists has percentage increases of 8% and 9 % for 'fatal and serious' and for 'slight' casualties. 

Table 6 (by borough - Camden) has the 40% figure for cyclists (although Islington has a similar number of casualties with only 1% increase).

At a meeting to discuss Sustainability and Transport with Sean Birch Cabinet Member, Sustainability and Transport (arranged by Maya de Souza and attended by Friends of the Earth on 26th May), I asked Sam Monck and Louise Bond whether they had seen those figures and requested information as to where the casualties had occurred. I have now received the detailed information on the links and junctions where they occurred from Matthew George, Transport Planner.

Email from Matthew George, 3 June 2010

Hi Jean

In response to your recent correspondence with Sam and Lou, we have carried out some research into the rise of cyclist casualties in 2010. It is hard to pin point why this increase has happened however this may be partly attributable to a large rise in cycling levels last year. Our traffic surveys showed that cycling numbers within Camden increased by 67% in 2010 from 2009. This is obviously excellent news, however it does highlight the need to increase efforts to ensure our roads are safe for all cyclists.

Summary

The vast majority of the increase has been in slights (45%) whereas KSI’s only increased by 1 incident (5%).

Cyclist 2009 %change 2010 %change
Total casualties 167 0 234 40
KSI 22 -0.05 23 5

Links

DESCRIPTION

HWY AUTHORITY

TOTAL CYCLIST CAS 2009

TOTAL CYCLIST CAS 2010

% CHANGE

FARRINGDON ROAD

TLRN

0

3

300.00%

SOUTHAMPTON ROAD-MALDEN RD

BOR

1

4

300.00%

CAMDEN ST

TLRN

0

3

300.00%

ST PANCRAS WAY

BOR

0

3

300.00%

PENTONVILLE ROAD

TLRN

0

2

200.00%

 

OAKLEY SQUARE EAST SIDE

TLRN

0

2

200.00%

GOODGE STREET

BOR

0

2

200.00%

BERNARD STREET

BOR

0

2

200.00%

HAVERSTOCK HILL

BOR

0

2

200.00%

ADELAIDE ROAD

BOR

0

2

200.00%

KENTISH TWN RD(CAMDEN ST-CAMDEN HIGH ST)

BOR

0

2

200.00%

PARKWAY

BOR

0

2

200.00%

DELANCEY STREET

BOR

0

2

200.00%

GRAYS INN ROAD

BOR

0

2

200.00%

CAMDEN ROAD

TLRN

4

11

175.00%

OSSULSTON STREET

BOR

0

1

100.00%

Junctions

DESCRIPTION

HWY AUTHORITY

TOTAL CYCLIST CAS 2009

TOTAL CYCLIST CAS 2010

% CHANGE

NEW OXFORD STREET/BLOOMSBURY WAY

BOR

0

4

400.00%

HAMPSTEAD ROAD/CARDINGTON STREET

TLRN

0

3

300.00%

CALTHORPE STREET/PHOENIX PLACE

BOR

0

3

300.00%

EVERSHOLT STREET/PHOENIX ROAD

BOR

0

2

200.00%

KINGS CROSS ROAD/PENTONVILLE ROAD/BORO BDY

TLRN

1

3

200.00%

AGAR GROVE/YORK WAY/BORO BDY

BOR

0

2

200.00%

GREVILLE STREET/BERNARD STREET

BOR

0

2

200.00%

TOTTENHAM COURT ROAD/GRAFTON WAY

BOR

0

2

200.00%

KENTISH TOWN ROAD/ROYAL COLLEGE STREET/CASTLE ROAD

BOR

0

2

200.00%

EUSTON ROAD/JUDD STREET

TLRN

0

2

200.00%

THEOBALDS ROAD/DRAKE STREET

BOR

0

2

200.00%

CHENIES STREET/GOWER STREET

BOR

0

2

200.00%

KINGSWAY/HIGH HOLBORN

BOR

0

2

200.00%

AVENUE ROAD / ACACIA ROAD

BOR

0

1

100.00%

OXFORD ROAD / KILBURN HIGH ROAD

BOR

0

1

100.00%

 

Conclusion

Camden has successfully reduced the total number of road casualties by 43% over the past ten years. Whilst we are concerned with the rise in slight cyclist casualties last year, the number of cyclists killed or seriously injured did not significantly rise. In the same time period, we have seen cycling flows increase by 67% in 2010 so overall rates of accidents will have decreased.

Camden will continue with a multi disciplinary approach to improve cycling road safety through education and targeting engineering measures in areas where they are most needed.  Our existing programme is well targeted to deal with this increase however we will amend our programme in 2012/13 as appropriate.

I hope that this information is of use.

Regards 

Matthew George 

Download the letter as a PDF

 

Jean Dollimore, 3 June 2010

 
 
Document Actions